How the Mighty Fall

By -

 
 
Volkswagen prided itself on its quality by using the tagline “Das Auto.” In a span of just three months, the auto maker has been forced to admit that millions of its diesel cars were equipped with software that was used to cheat on emission tests.

Researchers at West Virginia University conducted on-road tests on Volkswagen cars and determined that when tested on the road some cars emitted 40 times the permitted levels of nitrogen oxide – a pollutant that can cause emphysema, bronchitis, and respiratory diseases.

 
The “cheating” comprised a software that sensed when the car was being tested and activated equipment that reduced emissions. The software turned the equipment off during regular driving, emitting pollutants far above the legally permissible limits, possibly to improve performance or to reduce fuel consumption.
 
Globally, more than ten million vehicles (Golf, Jetta, Beetle, Passat, A3, and Porsche) are alleged to have been affected. The company, under pressure from regulators, has stated that it will recall over eight million diesel-powered vehicles in Europe starting in 2016. In the United States, users may have to wait more than a year. Vehicles may require both a hardware and a software change. The company has offered up to $1,000 to owners of diesel cars in the United States.

The costs have been enormous. The company reported its first quarterly loss in 15 years. It has halted the sale of affected cars. The share price has plummeted. The CEO has had to step down and several key executives have been suspended.

Volkswagen has admitted that it has understated the emission of carbon dioxide in about 800,000 vehicles.

All this could potentially mean over $10 billion in costs and penalties.
 
Why do organisations resort to such practices? Don’t we ever want to learn from recent history? Do you have to be No.1 at any cost?

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What Drives Team Success?

By -
Image
Ever wondered what distinguishes exceptional teams from others?

Psychological safety.

Coined by Harvard Professor Amy Edmondson, psychological safety has been found to be at the heart of great teams. She defines psychological safety as "ashared belief that the team is safe for interpersonal risk taking" and explains that psychologically safe environments exude "a sense of confidencethat the team will not embarrass, reject, or punish someone for speaking up."

It is important to remember that psychological safety is not the same as trust.

"Trust is the expectation that other people's future actions will be favorable to one's interests. Psychological safety refers to a climate in which people are comfortable being (and expressing) themselves. Although both constructs involve a willingness to be vulnerable to others' actions, they are conceptually and theoretically distinct. In particular, psychological safety is centrally tied to learning behavior, while …
Read more

7 Ways To Reduce Stress

By -
Image
According to the American Psychological Association, a majority of Americans experience a high degree of stress (https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2012/full-report.pdf). More than half of it is work-related. The disturbing news is that most of these are not even diagnosed and hence are not treated (http://journals.lww.com/psychosomaticmedicine/pages/results.aspx?txtkeywords=Stress).

Here are 7 ways you can reduce stress. These are based on scientific studies and the advice of experts.

1. Live the Moment, One Task at a Time


Look around you. Everyone seems to be in a hurry. Multi-tasking (even while driving) is the norm.

Slow down. Breathe deeply. Prioritize. Stick to one task at a time. Take a 7-minute break every hour.

Remember: Results are more important than the time it takes to achieve them.

2. Accept what you cannot control


"Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, the courage to change the things I can, and the wisdom to know the difference.&q…
Read more

The Paradox of Choice

By -
Image
One of the key elements of democracies is competition. One of the key outcomes of competition is choice. Choice is supposed to afford the freedom that is at the heart of rational decision making. Or that is what Economics 101 would tell you.
Now consider this. The average grocery store offers some 300 varieties of salad dressings. Are you sure that the one you had today, or yesterday, or last week, was indeed the best? How do you know? Have you tried all the 300? Or assume you want to build a stereo system that will provide you with endless hours of bliss. A well-stocked electronic components store can, in theory, allow you to build seven million varieties of stereo systems. How would you determine that the components that you choose would indeed provide the best possible sound? Choice is a fascinating subject to explore. In his book, The Paradox of Choice, Barry Schwartz argued that more choices lead to more stress and thus are less helpful in making decisions. His work builds on the pi…
Read more